There are several challenges to cyberspace security, including the fact that anonymous users often protect criminals. One way to address this problem is by increasing regulation, but this is unlikely and unethical. In the meantime, the Internet remains a last-resort for free speech and dissent. This article examines the challenges and opportunities for enhancing CS networks security. It also discusses the role of state institutions in expanding horizontal coordination mechanisms.
Information warfare in cyber environments
This article outlines the basic components of information warfare and the legal issues involved in countering this type of operation. It provides a broad overview of modern IW and suggests recommendations for domestic and international governance. The article explores the different components of modern IW and discusses the benefits and risks that information warfare poses. This article examines the potential use of information warfare to influence elections, influence public opinion, and target foreign policy objectives. For example, IW can be used to influence international law.
The use of information warfare is a growing global problem, and strategies must be considered from an international perspective. Instead of focusing on the technical aspects of information warfare (IW), information security professionals must consider the legal frameworks that underpin this type of activity. This means that countries need to foster cross-country collaboration between legal and technical IT professionals. Furthermore, they should strive to keep their registry of IW arsenal updated, as doing so may incite adversaries to share more materials.
Need for criminological research into the managerial aspects of CS networks
A growing body of criminological literature suggests a need for more interdisciplinary investigation of CS networks. Economic sociology describes networks as intermediate forms of coordination, governance, and social interaction. These networks are often person-specific and based on interpersonal trust. Although this type of network provides a unique advantage in the illegal context, it also makes the task of criminal investigation far more difficult than it would be in a different environment.
ALSO READ: The Metaverse Market is Expected to Generate $50B With Finance Sector Adoption by 2026
Need for state institutions to expand horizontal coordination mechanisms
The proliferation of CS networks, and the related cyber threats, requires increased horizontal coordination of global security efforts. State institutions must strengthen horizontal coordination mechanisms to combat the rapidly evolving threat landscape. In order to make these efforts more effective, they need to conduct more criminological research on managerial aspects of CS networks. Since the nature of power has increasingly moved from governments to non-state actors, the need for broader horizontal coordination mechanisms is more urgent than ever.
The role of these multilateral mechanisms in technology governance is to identify where new global rules and norms are needed. These mechanisms should be flexible enough to address the challenges and risks posed by technology-driven global challenges. They should also be able to constrain specific behavior and applications of technologies by states. In this way, they can effectively ensure that the global digital security community is adequately protected.