Russia accuses the U.S. in Moscow’s dispute with the U.K. about a Royal Navy warship. This claim follows a statement by Moscow on Wednesday, in which it claimed that it had fired warning shots as well as dropped bombs to deter HMS Defender from the U.K.

Russia said the British vessel had entered its territorial waters as it passed Crimea. Russia claimed that the British vessel entered its territorial waters when it passed through Crimea. Moscow annexed Crimea in 2014. However, the international community has yet to recognize Crimea as Russian.

The U.K. Ministry of Defense refuted the Kremlin’s account of events and stated that “no warning shots” were fired and that no bombs were dropped in the vessel’s path. The more straightforward explanation was that the Russians were conducting a gunnery drill in the area.

According to the U.K., Defender was conducting “innocent passage through Ukrainian territorial waters in compliance with international law.”

Moscow has continued to ramp up its rhetoric despite this explanation. Maria Zakharova, a foreign affairs spokesperson, stated that the British vessel would have not acted without U.S. knowledge.

She wrote in a post on Telegram that the ship was in the northwest part of the Black Sea in preparation for the U.S.-Ukrainian Sea Breeze drills, which start on Monday.|In a Telegram post, she wrote that the ship was currently in the Black Sea to prepare for the U.S.-Ukrainian Sea Breeze drills. These drills will begin Monday.}

“American experts note the special operations unit of the U.S. and the U.K. were engaged in training aboard ship at the time,” Zakharova wrote in comments published by state news agency Tass

“It is impossible to imagine that the British destroyer’s peaceful passage was not reached with the ‘big brother’ in these circumstances.

Russia has accused the U.S. of involvement in Moscow’s standoff with the U.K. over a Royal Navy warship in the Black Sea.

(c) Chris Mumby/MoD crown Copyright via Getty Images HMS Defender, the Royal Navy’s newest Type 45 Destroyer sails into her new home at HM Naval Base Portsmouth today, July 25, 2012. This was in Portsmouth, England. HMS Defender can defend against multiple strikes from anti-ship missiles of any sophistication, coming from any direction at supersonic speeds.This claim follows a statement by Moscow on Wednesday that it had fired warning shots, dropped bombs and deterred the U.K destroyer HMS Defence.

Russia said the British vessel had entered its territorial waters as it passed Crimea. Russia claimed that the British vessel entered its territorial waters when it passed through Crimea.} Moscow annexed Crimea in 2014. However, the international community has yet to recognize Crimea as Russian.

The U.K. Ministry of Defense refuted the Kremlin’s account of events and stated that “no warning shots” were fired and that no bombs had not been dropped in the vessel’s path. The more serious explanation was that the Russians were conducting a gunnery drill in the area.

Also Read: Paris Hilton Shows Solidarity with Britney Spears by Wearing a ‘Toxic” Outfit

According to the U.K., Defender was conducting “innocent passage through Ukrainian territorial waters in compliance with international law.”

Moscow has continued to ramp up its rhetoric despite this explanation. Maria Zakharova, a foreign affairs spokesperson, stated that the British vessel would have not acted without U.S. knowledge.

She wrote in a post on Telegram that the ship was in the northwest part of the Black Sea in preparation for the U.S.-Ukrainian Sea Breeze drills, which start on Monday.|In a Telegram post, she wrote that the ship was currently in the Black Sea to prepare for the U.S.-Ukrainian Sea Breeze drills. These drills will begin Monday.

In comments published by state news agency Tass, Zakharova stated that “American experts” noted that the special operations unit of the U.S. and the U.K were training on the ship during the incident.

“In these circumstances, it is impossible for the ‘peaceful passage of the British destroyer’ to be not agreed upon with the big brother.

Also  Read: Mercedes leaked sensitive information about 1,000 customers

Russia seized the initiative this week, by presenting its narrative that Moscow was facing a NATO threat in the Black Sea–and had seen it off. Russia took the initiative this Week, presenting its narrative about how Moscow was facing a NATO threat at the Black Sea. It had also seen it off.}

The U.K. has been relatively quiet since the incident but Russia continues to communicate, primarily to a domestic audience that it is under siege.

Sergei Ryabkov, Russia’s deputy foreign minister, told reporters that there were “malicious attempts” made by officials in London as well as “some representatives from the U.S. government, to distort what actually happened.”